The outcome displayed amounts of PCM notably influenced by the kind regarding matchmaking (H(2) = ; p =

Moral Factors

All moral issues was protected, depending on the recommendations of Quality No. of the Ministry from Health. Their carry out is approved by the Integrity and you may Browse Chamber off this new Centro de- Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas of the Universidade Government carry out Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE Zero. 03490118.8. and you can Process No. step three.). With the first page of online questionnaire, there is new 100 % free and you can Advised Concur Label (FICT), and therefore presented facts about the risks and benefits associated with reacting the fresh research, as well as the verify regarding detachment out-of agree, as opposed to prejudice as well as any moment. Solely those players which appeared the consent solution got access to the analysis posts. Individuals who don’t see the concur choice was in fact rerouted in order to the termination of the newest survey.

To investigate you’ll be able to differences in PCM and you may NCM, with respect to the sociodemographic parameters: sex, community, proper care of young siblings, visibility otherwise absence of someone, and having or not that have pupils, comparisons ranging from teams have been made using the Mann-Whitney You take to ( Table step 1).

In the first, the connection between PCM and you will NCM is actually analyzed therefore was discovered that PCM (M = ; DP = ) correlates negatively to your NCM (Yards = ; DP = ); p =

Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS _est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS _est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).

On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS _est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS _est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).

Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS _est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS _est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).

One or two Spearman correlations were used. 000; r = -.494; r dos = .24. Regarding the second analysis new relationships between PCM, NCM and you may 16 individual and you may contextual parameters was basically looked at and certainly will rise above the crowd when you look at the Desk 2. Poor relationships have been found one another negative and positive ranging from PCM otherwise NCM https://kissbrides.com/sv/heta-franska-kvinnor/ and you can 12 of one’s parameters checked out. Especially the newest sociodemographic details: “quantity of siblings” and you may “delivery order” and the personality items: “conscientiousness” and you may “openness to play” presented zero significant correlations having PCM and you may NCM.